Superman review: Unpacking the movie’s geeky weirdness

Superman’s latest cinematic adventure takes a bold but uneven step into the future of DC’s superhero universe, blending eccentric humor with high-stakes action in a film that feels both overstuffed and insubstantial. With David Corenswet stepping into the iconic role, the new film offers comic book fans a whirlwind of nostalgic references and outlandish sci-fi flourishes, though it risks alienating wider audiences with its frenzied pacing and lack of emotional grounding.

The film marks the debut of DC’s ambitious new cinematic universe following the conclusion of its previous iteration, which stumbled with a series of underwhelming releases in 2023. Helmed by James Gunn, known for his work on Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy and DC’s The Suicide Squad, this new chapter aims to redefine the superhero genre within the DC franchise. Rather than cautiously laying the foundation for future stories, Gunn plunges headfirst into the action, delivering a spectacle that feels more like the continuation of an established saga than the beginning of a new era.

From the outset, viewers are thrust into a world where Superman has already become a familiar figure, protecting Metropolis for several years. He is romantically involved with the determined Lois Lane, portrayed by Rachel Brosnahan, and faces opposition from the villainous Lex Luthor, played with cold intensity by Nicholas Hoult. Interestingly, the film introduces several lesser-known superheroes alongside Superman, including Green Lantern, Mr. Terrific, and Hawkgirl, who form a morally ambiguous Justice Gang that both aids and complicates his mission.

Este enfoque para omitir la conocida historia de origen brinda un cambio de ritmo revitalizante. El público se ahorra la narrativa habitual de Krypton y Smallville, sumergiéndose directamente en el mundo dinámico de metahumanos y confrontaciones épicas. La incorporación de elementos inusuales como Krypto el Superperro y un equipo de asistentes robóticos de Superman añade un toque caprichoso no comúnmente presente en anteriores representaciones del personaje. Estas adiciones juguetonas evocan una sensación de autenticidad de cómic, atrayendo a los fanáticos de mucho tiempo que buscan un respiro del tono serio de películas anteriores.

Nonetheless, this distinctly unusual vision brings its own set of challenges. Gunn’s choice to fill the story with a bewildering assortment of ideas—duplicates, parallel worlds, strange beings, and societal observations—results in an experience that appears chaotic and lacking direction. The movie rushes through important story elements without allowing much space for character depth or emotional connection. Significant happenings like city-wide devastation and cross-dimensional journeys occur so swiftly that they reduce their possible effect, leaving viewers with brief impressions instead of enduring memories.

Although the visual effects are intricate, they add to the movie’s transient nature. The action is akin to a premium video game, featuring chaotic and destructive scenes that seem removed from real life. Even with references to the magnificence of Richard Donner’s 1978 Superman, like John Williams’ legendary score, the film finds it challenging to inspire comparable wonder. Ultimately, it presents a spectacle that captivates briefly but lacks the emotional depth needed for the audience to genuinely engage with the storyline.

In this iteration of Superman, David Corenswet takes on the lead role, introducing a timeless and genuine appeal to the character of Superman as well as his other identity, Clark Kent. However, the script doesn’t fully allow him to demonstrate the iconic kindness and empathy associated with the role. The portrayal tends to emphasize a hasty nature, as the Man of Steel frequently shows signs of irritation and mood swings, especially in scenes with Lois Lane. This approach diminishes the character’s usual portrayal as a steadfast symbol of optimism and ethical certainty, making it challenging for viewers to relate to him on a more profound level.

The movie’s brisk tempo and focus on quirks imply an imaginative direction led by excess rather than meticulous narrative crafting. Gunn seems to have taken on the project with an aim to fit in as much content as possible into one movie, perhaps fearing the chance might be fleeting. The outcome is a lopsided blend of creative comedy and shallow display that could entertain comic book fans but might not engage general audiences.

While the film’s ambition and playful tone are commendable, the lack of narrative cohesion and emotional depth hampers its effectiveness as the cornerstone of a new cinematic universe. The inclusion of whimsical elements, while entertaining, feels insufficient to carry the weight of the film’s larger thematic aspirations. The absence of quieter moments to explore Superman’s humanity and the moral dilemmas of his role further diminishes the story’s impact.

In the end, this iteration of Superman serves as both a bold experiment and a missed opportunity. It introduces a visually inventive and humor-laden world that deviates from the grim seriousness of previous entries but falls short of creating a compelling, lasting impression. The film’s frenetic energy and crowded plotline may appeal to devoted fans of the comics, but its failure to establish a grounded, relatable Superman could hinder its resonance with broader audiences.

James Gunn’s signature style—quirky, irreverent, and unabashedly geeky—shines throughout the film, offering moments of genuine amusement and surprise. Yet the absence of emotional stakes and the relentless pacing result in a cinematic experience that is entertaining in the moment but forgettable in the long run. As DC embarks on this new cinematic journey, one can only hope that future installments will find a better balance between spectacle and substance, ensuring that Superman once again becomes not just a symbol of power, but a hero whose story truly matters.